Peer Review

I think this poem analysis is good that to use a lot of quotations which is in the poem. He connect the quotation with his paper. I think that make this analysis more interesting. Also, he write a lot about the meaning of the poem. In the analysis, he also added his own thinking in the poem. I think this is a good analysis because he uses his own words to explain what the meaning for every sentence in the poem. The words "I count the hours I think of you" appeared lots of times. He spends more time to explain this sentences and says the differences between these two times. In the analysis, he also adds some his own opinions to let people understand it more easy. This is a good start for the analysis I think. The hook “what is love?” is good for readers to make a interest in this analysis. If he just begin this essay, it will be very boring. Also, he doesn’t only explain the sentences, and also he write the meaning of the words. That people can understand the poem not only by the sentences, and also by the verbs and etc.
Although he write so many things about the meaning, he doesn’t spend too many time to explain the deep things in the poem. I think there will have more deep things, such as the background. Why the author wrote this poem? We don’t know the reasons by reading this analysis. I think he can add more like that. Also, I think explain the title will be better because sometimes, the title will have some meaning to the poem. In this analysis, he uses too much time on the meaning to the poem which is not the things that people really want to know. I think add some more experience can make the reader go with the analysis; that will give readers more ideas to understand this poem, even it’s not right at all. By the other side, this analysis is too boring that use too many words in the poem. I think the quote should be in the right place. When the readers read that, they can understand why the author write this sentences.

Another big problem in this analysis is the paragraph. There are only one paragraph through the whole essay. That makes readers hard to read. I think to separate the paragraph will be a better choice because people will know what are they read about in this paragraph. In my opinion, in the first paragraph, he should write something about the meaning in the poem; in the second paragraph, it’s better to write the deep thing, such as the meaning of the title, the background about this poem. If he write this poem for only one paragraph, it will be very messy for the readers to read.

In conclusion, I think this analysis is good to have the meaning for the whole poem. However, it’s better to have more deep thinking and to separate the paragraph.